Author: joyce

The authors we have read in the first weeks of this course, from Plato to Aquinas, were each, in their own way, engaged in a search for truth. Selecting two works, compare and contrast the ways they approached the task and what they saw as the source of truth. To what extent were their pathways complementary or at odds? Please turn in a hard copy of your paper. Paper Guidelines Papers are to demonstrate critical engagement with the assigned reading, but will also be graded for organization, style, and clarity of students’ own argument. Spelling and grammar count. Keep in mind that a good paper is like a sports car. It’s not simply designed to get you from start to finish, but to get you there in style. Moreover, it wows people because it’s exciting, expertly-constructed, finely-tuned, and well-polished. Be sure that your paper has a well-articulated thesis in the opening paragraph — ie: state what you are going to argue — followed by supporting paragraphs in which you draw on information from the reading to build and defend your thesis. In other words, you need to make a claim and provide evidence to back it up. In keeping with that requirement, I ask that you do two things: 1) Underline your thesis statement 2) Include at least five passages from the readings. Cite as so: (The Crito), (Martyrdom of Perpetua and Felicitas)

I would like to write a reaction paper on the documentary inside job.

I have a findings narrative due in 4 days. we had to take look into our partners writing process and see what two methods they used to help them with writing. my partner said his two writing methods were military order papers and memes.

Create a pay system.

Examine and evaluate U.S. foreign policy from 1914-1918 during World War I , then examine the reasons for U.S. involvement in the war. Analyze the economic and political aftermath of the U.S. massive mobilization for war, discussing the following areas influenced by events: domestic, foreign, and political (U.S. and its Allies). In connection to US wartime policy, discuss in this section of your paper the aftermath of the Versailles Treaty and evaluate the effectiveness of Wilson’s Fourteen Points. Consider all economic, political, and social factors while constructing your argument.

Please find attached explicit directions for what I need done. It will be an editing project, a lot of the information is complete. I need you to fill in the blanks. You will need the SPSS program for this assignment. I do not need any cited resources.

This assessment requires you to analyze one of the following juvenile justice interventions: a Child Welfare policy that provides for the removal of children from their families (in NSW or any other Australian jurisdiction) the NSW Youth Drug Court a Youth Diversion strategy (such as cautions, warnings, or conferencing) Boot Camps Youth detention Alternatively, you can chose another intervention, however this should be discussed with the subject coordinator prior to commencing your essay. Your essay should include the following: a description of the intervention and who is targeted (eg programs for 13-18 year olds) objectives of the intervention (eg to reduce crime, rehabilitate offenders etc) policy and/or legislation governing the intervention (eg Young Offenders Act 1997) limitations and strengths of the intervention relevant theoretical perspectives (eg Strain theory, Marxist theory) your own critical analysis of the intervention (eg based on evidence, is the intervention helpful; is it politically motivated?; what are the likely impacts?; could there be an alternative?) Your intervention should be thoroughly researched and critically analyzed. It should encompass relevant theories, policies, legislation, and practices, and should be written in your own words, drawing on relevant literature. Your research should be evidence-based and critical, rather than simply a description of an intervention. You should begin planning your essay well in advance of the due date to allow ample time for ordering any library books or articles from the library. Remember, library staff are very helpful and very willing to assist however they can, so please contact them if you require assistance with databases or locating library items. Your essay should be well structured in a way that clearly sets out your argument, beginning with a clear introduction to your essay, and concluding with a summary of your argument. The body of your essay should flow and be logically set out. Please reference all your work with in-text references and and reference list at the end. Marks will be deducted for inaccurate/missing references.

In this essay you are required to apply criminology theory to the justice studies issue you discussed in assessment one and assessment two. In order to achieve this you may use more than one theory. Your essay should include the following: clear descriptions of any theories used including the key features of each theory analysis of the theories including their effectiveness, their application, problems, impacts, strengths and weaknesses the relevance of these theories to the justice issue you have chosen a discussion of how the theory would explain or apply to your chosen issue an evaluation of the theory and its applicability to your chosen issue Your goal with this essay is to analyze your chosen issue using limnological theory covered in this unit. In doing so it is important that you demonstrate your understanding of any theory used. By analyzing your chosen issue you should be able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the theory. Your essay should be an analysis rather than simply a description of what you have read. Your essay should be structured in a way that clearly sets out your argument, beginning with a clear, succinct introduction and concluding with a summary of your argument. The body of your essay should flow and material should be organized in a logical manner. Please reference all your work with in-text references and a reference list at the end. Marks will be deducted for inaccuracies or missing references. Successful completion of this assessment item will achieve the following learning outcomes: be able to explain the major criminology theories that have influenced the discipline over the last 200 years; be able to contextualize the development of theory within political and social changes over the last 200 years; be able to articulate the historical development of contemporary theory; be able to apply theory to explanations of crime and responses to crime; be able to critically analyze these theories; be able to articulate their understanding clearly and cogently; be able to use the work of major theorists and authors to inform their understanding; be able to demonstrate a growing professional awareness by being professional in all communications and conduct with academic staff and other students, and through presentation of assignments

Has Federalism lived up to the intentions of the Framers?

This paper must be written at a high school senior level. In order to write these explications you must be knowledgeable over the book Into The Wild, by Jon Krakauer. You will have to write two separate quote explications( 1 page each) based on two passages I provide you from the book. You must quote 3 quotes from the passages I provide for each explication. Each quote must be integrated and literary analysis must be provided. Describe what is symbolic and imagery throughout the passages. Passage #1 “Ken Thompson, the owner of an Anchorage auto-body shop, Gordon Samel, his employee, and their friend Ferdie Swanson, a construction worker, set out for the bus on September 6, 1992, stalking moose. It isn’t an easy place to reach. About ten miles past the end of the improved road the Stampede Trail crosses the Teklanika River, a fast, icy stream whose waters are opaque with glacial till. The trail comes down to the riverbank just upstream from a narrow gorge, through which the Teklanika surges in a boil of white water. The prospect of fording this latte-colored torrent discourages most people from traveling any farther.” Passage #2 “Six decades ago in this enchanting hideaway, less than a mile downstream from where the Mormon steps meet the floor of the gulch, twenty-year-old Everett Ruess carved his nom de plume into the canyon wall below a panel of Anasazi pictographs, and he did so again in the doorway of a small masonry structure built by the Anasazi for storing grain. “NEMO 1934,” he scrawled, no doubt moved by the same impulse that compelled Chris McCandless to inscribe “Alexander Supertramp/May 1992” on the wall of the Sushana bus—an impulse not so different, perhaps, from that which inspired the Anasazi to embellish the rock with their own now-indecipherable symbols. In any case, shortly after Ruess carved his mark into the sandstone, he departed Davis Gulch and mysteriously disappeared, apparently by design. An extensive search shed no light on his whereabouts. He was simply gone, swallowed whole by the desert. Sixty years later we still know next to nothing about what became of him.”