Author: joyce

Exam Content In the field, you will need to be able to communicate the results of your evaluation in a way that guides stakeholders through your process, extends understanding of your conclusions, and provokes questions and ideas that pave the way for future evaluation and change. You have already published an executive summary to use as an introduction to your final narrative. Complete your presentation by adding 10 to 15 slides that are designed to summarize the data you will collect. Use the outline that you prepared last week to map how you will communicate results. Also, take some time to consider a spectrum of responses given a variety of outcomes. In this way, you will be prepared for different reactions. Show the relationship between the goals and objectives of both the program and your proposed evaluation. Prepare slides in which you address the following: Results and recommendations welcomed by stakeholders Neutral results and recommendations Results and recommendations unwelcomed by stakeholders Include in your speaker notes details of how you will use the contingency planning you mapped in this week’s discussion. Format your PowerPoint® presentation to ensure the slides only contain essential information and as little text as possible. Do not design a slide made up of long bullet points. Your speaker notes convey the details you would give if you were presenting. For help, consult the guide on how to create speaker notes from Microsoft®. Include comprehensive speaker notes. Cite at least 2 peer-reviewed or similar references to support your assignment. Include a slide with APA-formatted references. Submit your assignment. Finally, prepare a 350-word summary document that your stakeholders can take with them and review. In this document, offer a concise review of the work you have done: In general, evaluation questions fall into these groups: Implementation: How and when will the evaluation take place? Effectiveness: Define evidence of evaluation quality and achievement. Efficiency: Summarize use of resources: time, human, and financial. Cost-Effectiveness: How will the value or benefit of evaluating the program to target improvement exceed the cost of maintaining the status quo? Attribution: How will progress on goals and objectives identified in your evaluation be shown to be related to program improvements, as opposed to other things that are going on at the same time? Cite a minimum of 3 peer-reviewed or similar sources to support your assignment. Format your executive summary according to APA guidelines. Submit your assignment.

Read any unresolved professor (or peer) comments and revisions made in Microsoft Word Track Changes on your Individual Course Paper in SharePoint . As needed, carefully re-read your original Topic Group: First publish Individual Course Paper (Module 1) assignment in Canvas and any required/supplied and supplemental sources that you found. (Re-)read all the peer Comments you received on your Individual Course Paper in the relevant Module 3 Canvas discussion thread for your Topic Group. Find at least one new, additional authoritative, analytical source that helps you expand your analysis in support of your thesis, and in a way that directly supports the expansion of your paper’s Body by 1 page. (You must, of course, both carefully cite to this new, additional source and include it in your paper’s References list—just like all those sources from Steps 1–2 above.) No later than Sunday, Dec. 1, 11:59 p.m., using all of the critique and new information from Steps 1–4 above, complete a major Expansion and Revision of your Individual Course Paper in the same Microsoft Word SharePoint file where you’ve already been working. The grading approach and rubric are the same as with the First publish and Revision 1. Make sure you read these instructions and the specific scoring criteria on the rubric. Revised Papers that don’t meet the minimums in these assignment instructions won’t get any points. Everyone has to read everyone else’s writing: you owe your peers a substantial effort. If you feel like you need more than the built-in Microsoft Word help with reviewing and resolving comments and accepting or rejecting changes, consider spending a few minutes on a LinkedIn Learning course. You can access LinkedIn Learning for free as a MSU Denver student by logging in using your MSU Denver email. (See the login procedure here .) I would recommend the Reviewing Documents with Others part of the “Word 2016 Essential Training” bookmarked here . Please note the following strict requirements apply to this Expanded & Revised Individual Course Paper: Do not add an abstract. This Expanded Paper must have exactly 3–4 pages of text. That means in the provided, numbered template, Page 1 will be your Title Page, the Body of your paper will start on Page 2 and end on Page 5, and your References will be on Page 6. Pay attention to maintain proper APA 7 Student Paper formatting and citation practices, using Purdue OWL as your reference. Make sure you re-read and follow MSU Denver’s Academic Integrity Standards . This course requires your original work and, consistent with Department policy , the use of generative AI is prohibited.

GET YOUR ANSWER TODAY! In 750-1,000 words, develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project proposal. You will use the evaluation plan in the Topic 8 assignment, during which […]

In 1,250-1,500 words, describe the ethical implications of implementing religion or spirituality into therapy regarding the four areas of ethical consideration listed below. Explain how the Christian worldview and the APA Code of Ethics guidelines can be used to help guide ethical decision making for each of these areas. Competence Multiple relationships Imposing religious values in therapy Informed consent The final submission should include: An APA title and reference page 1,250–1,500-word content addressing each of the four ethical considerations (consider making each guideline a separate heading) and incorporation of the Christian worldview and APA Code of Ethics guidelines. Incorporation of three peer-reviewed sources and the APA Code of Ethics. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. This assignment requires the use of the “Statement on the Integration of Faith and Work” found in the Course Resources.

Application of Evidence Based Practise for Nurses:
– 2000 words
– 5th December before midday
– Identify one key policy document relation to an area of clinical practice.
– Discuss the implications to person centred nursing care, supporting discussions with robust and contemporary literature.
– Keep policy confidential.
Introduction (150-200 words)
– What is the purpose of the essay?
– What is the content?
– EBP
– Include a statement of confidentiality supported by literature.
– Use of tool and why?
Main Body (1600 words)
– What is EBP, why is it important to nursing and nursing care policy – link to NMC.
– Discuss the relevance of EBP to nursing care policy – what is EBP, why is it important to nursing and nursing care policy – link this to NMC (2018)
– Local trust policies are recommended, but you can use a national policy. You need to anonymise the policy, in text and in the reference list – Local Trust Policy (Year) or NHS Policy (Year).
Rationale for choosing the policy.
– Why is it important? Why have I picked this?
– How can it reduce risks to patients? – include stats- cost, quality of life, reduction in hospital admissions.
– Go into depth of the history and it developments, how it has been implored.
Discuss the Policy
– What is the nature of the policy?
– What is the purpose of the policy?
– Who is it targeted towards – staff, patients, both?
– How was it developed ?- relates to the underpinning literature used to develop the policy.
– Discuss the evidence, the quality of the evidence- relate to the hierarchy of evidence and support points with literature. Be critical.
Critique a piece of research
– Focus on one piece of research that has been used to develop the policy.
– Qualitative or quantitative, or a combination of both.
– Use a tool to critique- CASP, JBI or RCN. Pick main 10 questions, subheadings. (Rationale)
– Look at the ethics in the research, has an application been made? How? Why is it important.
Consent – Discuss consent, draw on research methods- use literature to support. Research method- was the right one used for the type of study- support this also.
Discuss the importance of service user and carer involvement in research: Design, delivery and evaluation of the research. – where the participants vulnerable?, was there a pilot study? Why would this be important?
2 / 2
Bring all of this together – EBP in nursing in general, link to person-centred care and EBP in clinical area. Does the policy enable us to deliver person-centred care using EBP.
Conclusion (200 words)
– Summarise what has been discussed- key points, nothing new can be built, support with literature within discussion.
– Relay critique, how does the policy enable good nursing practice in a clinical setting and look into comparing how this compares to policies.
– Discuss the use of the CASP tool or whatever tool is used, and discuss why they are beneficial use and they aid in critiquing the policy.
– Round up points, what was the main issues and strengths of the policy and how it governs effective nursing practise with a clinical setting .
– What has happened in the past, any incidents that have occurred that caused or altered the policies.
– Discus what literature has been used to support points, and why it was chosen to be used.
– Discuss the critique tool, and why it was important to use and

 
Write a review of the four major cloud service providers, identifying the key services of each. After the completion of the review, discuss the security strategy of any one of them; please provide detailed explanation regarding their approach to security.
Your paper must conform to the APA style format and must be your own original work. A professional looking paper, well written with complete references is expected. 1500 words minimum.

Essay Instructions:
– Essay must be four complete pages minimum
– Three sources: two academic articles from the JSTOR database and the following textbook (Norton Anthology of American Literature, The Beginnings to 1865 Shorter Tenth Edition or Shorter Ninth Edition)
-Must contain a bold thesis statement, in-text citations, Works Cited, double space, page numbers, 12-font size, and Times New Roman font style.
Essay Topic:
-Emily Dickinson’s Themes in Her Poetry
-Thomas Wentworth Higginson famously suggested some categories for sorting out Dickinson’s themes and recurring interests, and these categories have endured, inflected though they might be with certain Gilded Age inhibitions. Those categories were “life,” “love,” “nature,” “time,” and “eternity.” Modifying or updating them slightly to countenance the fact that some of Dickinson’s thinking—or aspirations or terrors— seem more modern or modernist than Higginson might have liked, we can experiment with reading poems in groups so you can recognize recurring themes and essential variations on those themes:
-“Sexuality, desire, and love: 39; 225; 269; 409”
-Select 2-3 poems from the “Sexuality, desire, and love” group with the number poems listed above to analyze. Use the theme as your focus.

CYBERSECURITY GOVERNANCE IS WHERE WE HAVE BEEN FOCUSING ON FOR THE TOPIC IN THIS CLASS!
This week you examined appropriate resources for your program on quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods to think about how theory might align with your topic and a potential method for exploring it. For this discussion, choose one of the following options for your post:
Discuss your observations of the differences in how theory connects to qualitative and quantitative research.

Review the attached instructions thoroughly and address the posted questions in this 7–10-page paper. Make sure to review the attached Research Paper Grading Rubric as well.  
Case Study Grading RubricCriteriaRatingsPts
Conceptual Understanding & Critical Thinking
35 pts Points The case study includes problem statement (defining the issues and establishing the facts), determines the root causes of the problem (how it arose and how it got to this point), generates alternative solutions (analyzing and evaluating alternatives), and identifies the solution which best solves the problem and why (rationale). 0 pts Fail 
/ 35 pts
Integration of Scripture and Additional Text/Resources
10 pts Points Writing is supported with Scripture as well as with course text and unassigned materials (at least 2 external resources). 0 pts Fail 
/ 10 pts
Application/Personal Experience
25 pts Points Analyzes and summarizes the case addressing each question and integrates course theories and principles and relates to personal experience if/when appropriate. 0 pts Fail 
/ 25 pts
Organization
10 pts Points The case study is well-organized, including cover and reference pages, an introduction, summary, smooth transitions between topics, and logically developed paragraphs. 0 pts Fail 
/ 10 pts
Grammar/Writing Style
10 pts Points The case study employs correct English grammar, punctuation, and spelling, and appropriate word choices. In-text and after-text references are documented appropriately using APA style. 0 pts Fail 
/ 10 pts
Word Count/Length
10 pts Points The case study is the appropriate length, within the specified range. 0 pts Fail 
/ 10 pts

Please see attached for instructions. Below is the topic of discussion.
 
Do you agree with Loeber’s multiple pathways model? Do you know people who have traveled down those paths?