Author: joyce

Part 3: Policy Evaluation  * Evaluate your proposal using these key social work frameworks: * Systems * Social Justice * Ethics * Strength-Based * Sustainable * Evaluate your proposal for its intended efficiency (how ‘wisely’ resources like time, money, staffing, space, etc. are being used) and effectiveness (what you know about if it will work, for instance comparing to similar things already in place. This is akin to a cost-benefit analysis and a look at face validity. * How would you define success with this change? * Identify three major outcomes of your proposed policy change that you would measure to determine its success. Describe the steps you would take to measure these. What resources would you need? Briefly describe your plan for measurement. * Describe how you have considered the perspectives of your stakeholders in defining success. * Describe how you would engage individuals impacted by the social issue in determining what ‘success’ looks like and how it should be measured. As you do so consider the difference between satisfaction, the experience of whatever program or policy you are proposing, and the designed concrete outcomes. These are all very different. For example, you can be very satisfied with an outcome, but just have an ok time, and the outcome can actually be really small. Or you can be really dissatisfied, have a bad experience, and have a great outcome (e.g., terrible but life-saving experience in the hospital). These are DIFFERENT concepts. * Articulate how you would share your results. Be sure to talk through how you would share it to people impacted, as well as broader stakeholders. How would you ensure this is done with social justice in mind? How would you create a feedback loop to get input about the results that are shared?

The student will complete 8 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 250 words by Thursday 11/28/24. The student must then post 2 replies of at least 100 words by Sunday 12/1/24. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly citations in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the textbook, peer-reviewed journal articles, government sources, professional association websites, etc. Each original discussion will also require a biblical reference/quote (which is not a part of the original source count). Responding to a classmate’s thread requires both the addition of new ideas and analysis. A particular point made by the classmate must be addressed and built upon by your analysis in order to move the conversation forward. Thus, the reply is a rigorous assignment that requires you to build upon the thread to develop deeper and more thorough discussion of the ideas introduced. As such, replies that merely affirm, restate or unprofessionally quarrel with the previous thread(s) and fail to make a valuable, substantive contribution to the discussion will receive appropriate point deductions.

GET YOUR ANSWER TODAY! In 750-1,000 words, develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project proposal. You will use the evaluation plan in the Topic 8 assignment, during which […]

In 1,250-1,500 words, describe the ethical implications of implementing religion or spirituality into therapy regarding the four areas of ethical consideration listed below. Explain how the Christian worldview and the APA Code of Ethics guidelines can be used to help guide ethical decision making for each of these areas. Competence Multiple relationships Imposing religious values in therapy Informed consent The final submission should include: An APA title and reference page 1,250–1,500-word content addressing each of the four ethical considerations (consider making each guideline a separate heading) and incorporation of the Christian worldview and APA Code of Ethics guidelines. Incorporation of three peer-reviewed sources and the APA Code of Ethics. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. This assignment requires the use of the “Statement on the Integration of Faith and Work” found in the Course Resources.

In this week’s discussion: Discuss how the COVID-19 pandemic has influenced the healthcare safety and quality initiatives set forth in KSA’s Vision 2030. Describe the barriers that the COVID-19 pandemic has created. Analyze the role of the healthcare quality improvement specialist to mitigate these barriers and drive quality in healthcare in the future. Embed course material concepts, principles, and theories (which require supporting citations) in your initial response along with at least one scholarly, peer-reviewed journal article. Keep in mind that these scholarly references can be found in the Saudi Digital Library by conducting an advanced search specific to scholarly references. Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines. You are required to reply to at least two peer discussion question post answers to this weekly discussion question and/or your instructor’s response to your posting. These post replies need to be substantial and constructive in nature. They should add to the content of the post and evaluate/analyze that post’s answer. Normal course dialogue doesn’t fulfill these two peer replies but is expected throughout the course. Answering all course questions is also required.

Proposal/topic of paper: The Role of “Con Te Partirò” in Italian Identity and Global Perception The paper examines the point where Italian cultural identity and the global popularity of classical crossover music meet, considering as a case study Andrea Bocelli’s “Con Te Partirò.” Its operatic core fully blends with its mainstream appeal, mirroring how Italian musical heritage interacts with international audiences. Its main focus is on how this combination of traditional Italian operatic expressions with popular music influences provides for a wider understanding of Italian identity and Italy’s cultural perception by the world. This combination of tradition and modernity makes “Con Te Partirò” a bridge, joining Italian heritage with Globe-spanning musical tastes, thereby rearranging the perception of Italian music and culture. Moreover, it will examine the role of language, emphasizing the use of Italian in global music and how it serves as a marker of cultural pride and identity. Feedback from teacher: Hi Vincent, While you can use “Con Te Partirò” as a case study, keep your paper focused on Italian cultural identity and classical crossover. In your paper, you cannot focus on Western classical music. See the following instruction: “You may focus on music from any part of the world (***except music from the Western European classical tradition***….”)

based on the attached files, you find my first report , second report, no i want to do the third report based on the prices list of my stocks and bonds , and i already have the template for needed requirements. 1- Prepare the required inputs for the Markowitz model (Full covariance model). 2- Determine the covariance between each pair of assets to understand their co-movements and diversify accordingly. 3- Apply the Markowitz optimization procedure to calculate the weights that will minimize the portfolio’s variance for a target level of return. This involves using tools such as Excel’s Solver. 4- Summarize the optimized asset weights within the risky portfolio. Considering 4 as your level of risk aversion, identify the best mix of risky portfolio and risk-free asset to be able to reach the optimal complete portfolio. 5- Identify expected portfolio return and risk derived from the Markowitz Model Kindly clarify each step in the excel with their formulas.

Post a response answering the following: Explain the difference between ion channels and G proteins as they relate to signal transduction and targets of medications. How would you answer the following patient question: My grandmother has a mental illness. I have the same genes as her. Will I also get the same mental illness? Note: Your response needs to be supported and validated by three (3) scholarly peer-reviewed resources located outside of your course Read a selection of your colleagues’ posts. Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days by supporting or expanding on their explanation, as well as how they have described their response to the patient.

Part 3: Policy Evaluation  * Evaluate your proposal using these key social work frameworks: * Systems * Social Justice * Ethics * Strength-Based * Sustainable * Evaluate your proposal for its intended efficiency (how ‘wisely’ resources like time, money, staffing, space, etc. are being used) and effectiveness (what you know about if it will work, for instance comparing to similar things already in place. This is akin to a cost-benefit analysis and a look at face validity. * How would you define success with this change? * Identify three major outcomes of your proposed policy change that you would measure to determine its success. Describe the steps you would take to measure these. What resources would you need? Briefly describe your plan for measurement. * Describe how you have considered the perspectives of your stakeholders in defining success. * Describe how you would engage individuals impacted by the social issue in determining what ‘success’ looks like and how it should be measured. As you do so consider the difference between satisfaction, the experience of whatever program or policy you are proposing, and the designed concrete outcomes. These are all very different. For example, you can be very satisfied with an outcome, but just have an ok time, and the outcome can actually be really small. Or you can be really dissatisfied, have a bad experience, and have a great outcome (e.g., terrible but life-saving experience in the hospital). These are DIFFERENT concepts. * Articulate how you would share your results. Be sure to talk through how you would share it to people impacted, as well as broader stakeholders. How would you ensure this is done with social justice in mind? How would you create a feedback loop to get input about the results that are shared?

The student will complete 8 Discussions in this course. The student will post one thread of at least 250 words by Thursday 11/28/24. The student must then post 2 replies of at least 100 words by Sunday 12/1/24. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 2 scholarly citations in APA format. Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. Acceptable sources include the textbook, peer-reviewed journal articles, government sources, professional association websites, etc. Each original discussion will also require a biblical reference/quote (which is not a part of the original source count). Responding to a classmate’s thread requires both the addition of new ideas and analysis. A particular point made by the classmate must be addressed and built upon by your analysis in order to move the conversation forward. Thus, the reply is a rigorous assignment that requires you to build upon the thread to develop deeper and more thorough discussion of the ideas introduced. As such, replies that merely affirm, restate or unprofessionally quarrel with the previous thread(s) and fail to make a valuable, substantive contribution to the discussion will receive appropriate point deductions.