Author: joyce

Please follow the outline to write part 2.
The sample is the full paper (sample for part 2, just look at the yellow Highline).
I included part 1 which I had completed and submitted.

 
The purpose of this assignment is to reflect on the dissemination of the Capstone Project Change Proposal PowerPoint developed in Topic 9 and presented this week.
Present the PowerPoint you created in Topic 9 to a group of relevant interdisciplinary leaders or stakeholders at your practicum site.
After presenting your PowerPoint, write a 250-500-word reflection that includes the following:
Describe who was part of the audience for your presentation and their role related to the proposed project.
Describe two ways in which you communicated professionally during your presentation.
Discuss the feedback and questions received from the audience after your presentation. Identify any biases that might have affected your presentation of your project.
Describe how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future.
APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Read the instructions for the assignment and follow precisely. Quick glance at instructions. There are 5 questions on this assignment. The assignment should be answered in a single Excel workbook, with one question per tab (please label each tab – Title, Q1, Q2, etc.)

paper needs small adjustments to fit rubric, paper to edit will be attached.
Rubric notes:
The submission states that the expected outcomes include reduced alcohol consumption, better mental health, and quality of life. However, the response requires further development to adequately explain how the expected outcomes are appropriate for the target audience. Additionally, the information is not supported by a credible source. sources must be within 5 years.
The submission includes a reference list with three valuable sources and in-text citations. This aspect can be fully evaluated once the information in Aspect A3 is supported by a scholarly source.

After reviewing the 2 prior milestones included below then complete the milestone 3 essay 1 page with 3 references with in citation texts. Below will include the assignment instruction and rubric with guidelines how to complete in a.p.a format. Reach out with any questions please and thank you.

I need this Paper done by NOON ET TOMORROW!!!! If you can’t do it I’ll find somebody else. I NEED THIS DONE BY NOON AM ET TOMORROW ASAP!!! Directions AND Attachments for the paper and template/ expand of how the paper needs to be outlines are in the attachment!!!

Need a question concerning this week‘s material And  respond to question below.
Why is the male/female dichotomy problematic?

1.Liberty and Freedom: “Conflicts over liberty and freedom are simple to resolve: A person should be free to do or say anything they choose as long as it does no harm to others.”In asking you to write a DIALECTICAL DIALOGUE, I am asking you to write a conversation between two interlocuters, one of whom begins the conversation by asserting and defending the view expressed in the quote, and the other of whom questions and challenges the views and arguments made by the first. The conversation that you write up, to be properly dialectical, should do the following:
Explain or interpret the view (more than one interpretation may be possible).
Consider reasons for thinking the view is true.
Consider reasons for thinking it is false.
Consider the strengths and weaknesses of the reasons offered both in defending and in criticizing the view (2 and 3 above).
Explore the topic beyond the original quote in whatever way the conversation takes it. please cite ALL sources (including the URL—web address—for any online sources). Plagiarism will result in a failure for the assignment, at the very least. If you are unsure whether something constitutes plagiarism, be sure to err on the side of caution and provide a reference.

“Formatting
Font, Margins, Spacing, Title: Typed, double-spaced, 12-pt Times New Roman font, 1-inch page margins, original title that gives the reader an idea of the main theme/topic of the essay.
Page Length: 3 – 4 pages long, (1/2 page shorter or longer ok)
Structure and Thesis: Introduction, body paragraphs, and Conclusion. Thesis statement Download Thesis statement at the end of the Introduction.
Quotes and Works Cited: Use quotes from the primary source documents and GML. Cite with (Author, page number) after the quote. Aim for 1-2 quotes per body paragraph. Each quote no longer than 3 lines. No need for Works Cited, no penalty if included.
Plagiarism: Your essay must be your own work. Turnitin will scan it and compare to everything in its database (student essays, websites, books, etc.). Any plagiarized content may result in point penalties and reporting to the Campus Disciplinarian. Your essay must be scanned by Turnitin for me to grade it.
Try using Turnitin’s Draft Coach feature so you can scan your essay yourself before submitting to see if there are issues.
AI: The Turnitin report includes a percentage for AI. This percentage must be zero for me to grade your essay. AI now is used in many places, not just Chat GPT, also Grammarly, Google Translate, and even Google searches. You can still use the Spelling Check and Grammar Check programs embedded in Word/Google Docs.
Help! Go to the History and Writing Resources link for more help: thesis statements, scoring rubric I use, grammar worksheet, and a really helpful outside website. Make an appointment with the Writing and Humanities Tutoring Center. Talk to me! I am here to help and can look at your rough draft and answer questions.
Submit the file here (not on Turnitin.com). If using Apple Pages or Google Docs, convert file to PDF before submitting.
Late Papers: I can give some extra time, but we’re getting towards the end of the semester. The latest I can accept the essay, and all makeup work, is the due date for the final.

Paper Prompt
In Weeks 10 – 13, we examined key developments from 1800 to 1840, including the Market Revolution, Jacksonian Democracy, Indian Removal, and the Cotton Kingdom. Choose TWO of these developments and analyze how they affected Americans’ freedom and changed the meaning of freedom itself.
Your paper must utilize 2 assigned primary source documents from Weeks 10-13 to support your analysis. Your paper will not earn a passing grade if it does not fulfill this requirement.
Remember that the essay should not be based solely on the primary source documents. Most information should come from GML and class sessions, with primary sources just used to provide evidence.”

This week, I would like to introduce the concept of a fact pattern. A fact pattern is a fictitious story that illustrates legal concepts. In law school, law professors create fact patterns to illustrate legal concepts.

In this class, you will apply the concepts from your readings (and outside legal research) to analyze a series of fact patterns in the discussion boards. These fact patterns may omit key facts, and I will never provide you with the law needed to analyze the fact pattern. I do this purposefully because I want each of you to understand how: (a) liability analysis (the process of determining who should be held responsible for certain actions) is fact sensitive, and (b) legal professionals must engage in legal research daily.

You can conduct legal research by using Nexis Uni, a product of Lexis Nexis. Nexis Uni will provide you with access to cases, statutes, and other legal resources that will help you succeed in this class. You can access Nexis Uni via the school’s library. To access Nexis Uni, you must be logged into this classroom and click on the library tab. Once you have clicked on the “Library tab,” a pop-up will appear. Then, you need to click on research and then click on Articles and Databases. Then, click on the letter “N,” and you will locate Nexis Uni.

Now, let’s explore the first fact pattern in this class.

Jimmy Varney is an online professor who teaches law and history courses. He also loves sports and tries to attend as many sporting events as possible to see his fellow human beings in person. On May 3, 2022, Professor Varney, a fan of free giveaways, attended a home game of the Birmingham Barons, a local minor league baseball team in your home state, to get a free t-shirt and one-dollar hot dogs. Professor Varney never drinks beer or other alcoholic beverages at games. Instead of beer, Professor Varney drinks large amounts of Diet Coke. (As a child, Professor Varney’s grandfather was in a major car accident with a drunk driver, and this tragic event shaped his views on drinking and driving.)

While Professor Varney is a teetotaler, Drunk David, a twenty-one-year college student, has no reservations about drinking beer at games. Drunk David downs a six-pack at every home game in the company of his Alpha Beta fraternity brothers. Drunk David downed a six-pack of beer on the day in question and had a Purple Nipple shot. (A Purple Nipple shot is a combination of Jagermeister, Midori Melon Liqueur, and cranberry and orange juices.)

Coincidentally, Professor Varney and Drunk David attended the same ball game and left simultaneously. After eating half a dozen dirty water dollar hot dogs, Professor Varney realized that he needed to go home to grade a stack of dreaded case brief assignments in his Torts Law class.

Professor Varney and Drunk David, who were driving in separate vehicles, attempted to exit the parking lot when Professor Varney’s wife calls to tell him to buy some food for their dog Fido. At the same time, Drunk David got a text from a romantic liaison who demanded that he retrieve the dirty clothes and other belongings left in the liaison’s apartment because he was breaking up with Drunk David. Professor Varney stopped suddenly to pick up his cellphone; Drunk David, who was not paying attention and was driving over fifty miles an hour in the parking lot, struck Professor Varney’s Chevy Spark in the rear, totaling his car’s rear end. Professor Varney was wearing his seatbelt, which prevented major injuries. However, when the airbag deployed in Professor Varney’s car, he was hit in the face, and the airbag’s impact knocked out his two front teeth and gave him a black eye.

In contrast, Drunk David wasn’t so fortunate because Drunk David was driving a motorcycle without a helmet. When Drunk David hit the back of Professor Varney’s car, Drunk David got thrown into the air, and his head hit the pavement upon landing. The head injury resulted in Drunk David’s hospitalization. While at the hospital, Drunk David, who did not get vaccinated for COVID-19, contracted the virus. Within days of contracting COVID, Drunk David was placed on a ventilator and died due to a staph infection. Drunk David’s body lay unrecovered for several weeks as it was difficult to locate his parents.

After Drunk David died, his estranged mother, Greedy Sally, emerged to collect her Drunk David remains a few weeks later. Before burying her son, Greedy Sally visited a local attorney in Birmingham, Alabama, to see whether she can sue anyone for her son’s death.

Assume that you were the attorney whom Greedy Sally visited.
Who could Greedy Sally sue?
What is the likelihood of success of each of her claims? For each such potential claim, note what:
the value might be to Greedy Sally’s case to assess the points of view of the other potential parties;
additional information is needed to assess each party’s liability; and
the cases, statutes, and/or other supporting resources that you used to evaluate each party’s respective perspective.
How did your act of conducting legal research while you analyzed this fact pattern help (or hinder) you in evaluating the case?
As you critically thought about each party’s perspective during your analysis, did you come to any new realizations about possible new solutions (other than applying the law) to any underlying problems within this fact pattern, such as whether the law ought to change in some way or new safety protections might be needed, etc.?
How can your suggestions be implemented, other than through litigation? Can technology be harnessed in some way to facilitate implementation?