What did you argue and what did the evidence show?

Write a 4 page (double spaced, 12 point Times New Roman font) paper on critically analyze Federal-State relations. Points to be covered/ Tasks Introduction; 1. Capture the interest of the reader. Perhaps you can do this by pointing out a puzzle that we don’t yet understand or a controversy in current scholarship. Perhaps you can draw on the normative importance of your topic and get the reader into the subject – matter. 2. Develop 5-8 research questions; how would you address the questions? Literature review; 1. Explain, analyze and discuss the types of federalism; how they changed from dual – cooperative – coercive. What is the current situation; Federal-Texas relation. In analyzing this part; situate your research questions within the literature and show how your project moves. What other scholars argue. It should not deviate from the topic; A literature review should not be merely a technical reporting of what has been done before, but a creative organization of past work that helps to frame and build your argument. (Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other facebook to not qualify as academic resources). Argument/Hypothesis; Drawing on your literature review, you must explain your argument to your reader clearly and fully. What brings to you to this analysis? The Conclusion: In the conclusion, you should accomplish these goals: 1. Summarize your paper; What did you argue and what did the evidence show? 2. Discuss directions for future research. Did your analysis raise new questions? 3.